- No pop up holdem manager 2 how to#
- No pop up holdem manager 2 portable#
- No pop up holdem manager 2 windows#
And for a lot of users, this area of the program becomes a difference-maker. Both the Holdem Manager and Poker Tracker have quite a different process for filters. The ability to set up specific situations, and generate lots of great data and hands to review is the power of filtering. Overall the essential framework for Poker Tracker is just much better than Holdem Manager 2. You won’t be getting as many crashes with Poker Tracker as you potentially would with Holdem Manager. It’s just lighter on system resources and more reliable.
No pop up holdem manager 2 windows#
The major drawback to it though is that you’re locked into windows based platforms and there’s not as much portability to other OS platforms.īOTTOM LINE: Poker Tracker has a huge edge here. It’s a very clean and sleek and somewhat newer coding language. Holdem Manager 2’s interface was written in WPF (windows presentation foundation). Keep in mind that if you are running large databases, you’ll need a somewhat newer system with enough ram and processor power no matter which database you use. When you start getting over 400 MB’s though, the performance of Holdem manager 2 will be much quicker and more responsive. In smaller databases of about 400 MB’s or less (this is where your hand count would be ~300k-350k), you wouldn’t see a major difference in benchmark time between the two databases. So in large database situations, Holdem manager 2 is much faster than poker tracker 4 when retrieving data or running filters. Once the data is loaded, it can cycle through its cache to pull any info you need. While Holdem Manager 2 uses MySQL also, it cache’s just about all of its user data into memory when you load the application up.
No pop up holdem manager 2 portable#
The major advantage of writing in C++ is it’s a stable coding environment, and it’s much more portable to other platforms such as MAC OS. Thus it can be a little slow at certain times when getting large amounts of data, but overall it keeps your system resources flexible and low. It uses relatively low system resources during most of its overall function. All data can be dumped once it’s retrieved. This is a slow and methodical approach, but it also less memory intensive since there’s no real info that needs to be stored long in memory or cache. This means each time that you want to view your stats, or review a hand from your database, Poker Tracker queries the MySQL database, retrieves the data, and then displays it for you. Poker Tracker uses a query when needed approach to retrieve the data it needs to display to the user. There are some ways to work around that though, and this is not an issue for most users. There are some drawbacks to this since the initial development of MySQL was done before expanded file size limits, the storage limitations hold at 4 gigabytes total.
With MySQL, both companies could reduce development and 3rd part library costs. Other options are available, such as oracle for example, but the need for such a large storage option isn’t necessary for most users, and the general cost of commercial licensing for something like Oracle would have bumped up the sales price significantly. There are pros and cons to each approach, so I will outline both of them.īoth databases use MySQL as their database storage option of choice. The essential bones of each application, and how they go about storing and retrieving information is a bit different.
No pop up holdem manager 2 how to#
After reading this, you should have a much better idea of how to get your needs met so that you can focus on poker and get the most from your poker database of choice. It will depend on which aspects of a poker database application are most important to you. In the end, a lot of it will come down to personal preference. It’s not just a simple poker tracker vs holdem manager dilemma that will cause you to stay up nights trying to decide which will make you the best poker player in the world.
They both do a lot of similar things in different ways. My goal in this article isn’t to convince you that one is much better than the other. There’s a lot of significant differences between these two popular database applications.
0 kommentar(er)
